Camelot Commentaries RSS

Winners and Losers of the Pandemic

by Thomas Kirchner, CFA & Paul Hoffmeister

Since the beginning of the crisis, perma bears and perma bulls have disagreed about whether we are headed for a severe depression or whether there will be a rapid V-shaped recovery once the economy opens up again. The stock market’s verdict so far validates the optimists: the S&P 500 has recently retraced 62 percent of its losses.

Predictably, Europa and Asia are lagging, but not by much: both the DAX and the Nikkei 225 have recovered half of their peak losses. Of the 500 stocks in the S&P, almost 100 are positive YTD, while that is the case for only four of the 30 DAX stocks and 15 of the 225 Nikkei stocks [i]. There are wide gaps between industries and sectors within each index: travel and financial stocks were the key drivers of the drawdown in the S&P while automotive and industrial stocks suffered the heaviest losses in the DAX. The winners seemingly everywhere were stocks that benefit from stock trading volume, mainly exchanges and brokers, as well as pharmaceutical stocks. In the S&P, large technology companies also were able to recover quickly after initial price losses. Many large cap tech companies, by the way, have grown so much in recent years that a handful of these companies now represent 20 percent of the total value of the S&P 500, a trend that their recent outperformance has reinforced further.

One of the big buyers during the selloff has been the Swiss National Bank (SNB) that is defending the Franc against a falling Euro. Not only does the Swiss Franc remain true to its reputation as a safe-haven during times of crisis, but negative yields in Swiss government bonds are now comparable to those in the Eurozone. With Swiss yields less punitive than before the crisis when compared to Eurozone yields, the Swiss Franc has become less unappealing as a currency relative to the Euro. This is likely to have encouraged further inflows. The SNB has used the foreign currency reserves that it has amassed over the last few years in an attempt to keep the Franc weak to invest not just in foreign government bonds, as central banks typically do, but also by investing in stocks. The SNB purchased some of the most famous large cap tech stocks during the first quarter. With turmoil in the FX market continuing into April, it is safe to assume that its purchases have continued in Q2. These massive purchases have arguably contributed to the outperformance of large cap stocks. [ii]

Smaller technology stocks are also among the winners, especially if they support teleworking. Citrix, Ringcentral and Zoom may generate record earnings thanks to their computer access and video conferencing software. Zoom founder, Eric Yuan, has become some $4 billion richer as the stock of that company has nearly doubled since the beginning of the year. Similarly, Docusign and Adobe have outperformed. They allow documents to be signed electronically.

In the pharmaceutical industry Gilead, Fresenius and Merck are some of the biggest winners. Gilead's share price has rallied 69 percent this year as investors placed high hopes in the Remdesivir drug approved for the treatment of Covid-19. However, it is still unclear if and by how much Gilead will be able to make profits from it. The company announced the free donation of 1.5 million doses, which will impact financials. What pricing and costs will look like once commercial sales begin is unclear. In the optimistic scenario, analysts estimate that the value of future Remdesivir profits may only represent 1-4 Dollars per share, or less than five percent of the current market price. [iii] In our view, much of the good news has already been priced into this stock. [iii]

Other notable winners and losers are mining stocks, which reflect the prices of the respective commodities: Newmont, the only gold producer in the S&P 500, rose almost 50 percent this year, whereas oil producers have in many cases lost about the same amount.

Finally, in this global fight against a sinister virus, the bleach maker Clorox has seen its stock rally by nearly one third since the beginning of the year, similar to the growth in sales in its cleaning products division. However, the actual demand for disinfectants is even higher than what the sales increase might suggest. Production capacity for disinfectants lags demand and the expansion of that capacity may be completed during the summer. Therefore, sales might be boosted further, if additional product can be shipped. [iv]

Stocks will likely have more volatility and turbulence in the months ahead. The stock market’s winners and losers may still take some surprising twists and turns. If the perma bears are correct, then current trends of who is a winner and a loser could persist. However, if the bulls are correct and the economy opens gradually and there isn’t a major second wave of viral infections, then we expect stocks that have been laggards so far to become some of the biggest winners.

[i] All returns are YTD through 5/8 unless noted otherwise. Source: Bloomberg.

[ii] Author’s analysis of Forms 13F-HR filed by the Swiss National Bank with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for the periods ended 12/31/19 and 3/31/30.

[iii] Carter Gould, Andrew Ang, Justin Burns: “Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Our Thoughts Post the 1Q20 Call.” Barclays Bank Equity Research, May 1, 2020.

[iv] Clorox earnings press release for Q1 2020 filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 8-k on May 1, 2020.

Thomas Kirchner,CFA, has been responsible for the day-to-day management of the Camelot Event Driven Fund since its 2003 inception. Prior to joining Camelot he was previously was the founder of Pennsylvania Avenue Advisers LLC and the portfolio manager of the Pennsylvania Avenue Event-Driven Fund. He is the author of 'Merger Arbitrage: How To Profit From Global Event Driven Arbitrage.' (Wiley Finance, 2nd ed 2016) and has earned the right to use the CFA designation. 

Paul Hoffmeister is chief economist and portfolio manager at Camelot Portfolios, managing partner of Camelot Event-Driven Advisors, and co-portfolio manager of Camelot Event-Driven Fund (tickers: EVDIX, EVDAX).
Mr. Hoffmeister is a graduate of Georgetown University with a BS in Accounting and Finance, and MBA from Northwestern’s Kellogg School of Management.

Disclosures:

•       Past performance may not be indicative of future results. Therefore, no current or prospective client should assume that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy (including the investments and/or investment strategies recommended by the adviser), will be profitable or equal to past performance levels.

•       This material is intended to be educational in nature, and not as a recommendation of any particular strategy, approach, product or concept for any particular advisor or client.  These materials are not intended as any form of substitute for individualized investment advice.  The discussion is general in nature, and therefore not intended to recommend or endorse any asset class, security, or technical aspect of any security for the purpose of allowing a reader to use the approach on their own.  Before participating in any investment program or making any investment, clients as well as all other readers are encouraged to consult with their own professional advisers, including investment advisers and tax advisors.  Camelot Event Driven Advisors can assist in determining a suitable investment approach for a given individual, which may or may not closely resemble the strategies outlined herein.

Originally published on http://www.camelotportfolios.com/commentaries

The Covid-19 Economy

Understanding the Recent Behavior in Stock & Political Markets
by Paul Hoffmeister - Chief Economist, Camelot Portfolios

Camelot Commentaries RSS

---

Covid-19 Shutdown Has Been Economically Devastating

• According to the U.S. Department of Labor, more than 30 million Americans have filed for unemployment benefits since mid-March 2020.

• The national unemployment rate may now be 15%, up from 3.5% at the end of 2019.

• GDP may contract by 20-30%.

• Key Uncertainties:

  • how quickly will the pandemic fade?

  • what will be the scope and speed of an economic rebound?

---

Stocks May Have Found a Bottom

• Covid-19 acceleration, economic shutdowns, and oil price war conspired to pull prices down in late February, early March.

• Improving case numbers, news of economies reopening, and oil production deal helped to start pushing prices higher in late March, early April.

• Most likely, stock indices will be primarily driven by Covid-19 outlook and economies restarting.

• We must focus on any hints of a ‘second wave’.

---

 Covid-19 Data Has Improved

• According to Johns Hopkins, the most confirmed Covid-19 cases were in the United States, Spain and Italy.

• According to the University of Washington, Covid-19 deaths in Italy peaked on March 27.

• Covid-19 case trajectory in Italy seems consistent with recent stock market price action.

• In late April, some Italian businesses started to reopen

• According to the University of Washington, Covid-19 deaths   in Spain peaked on April 1.

• Covid-19 case trajectory in Spain appears consistent with recent stock market price action.

• Many Spanish businesses plan on reopening in coming days.

• According to the University of Washington, Covid-19 deaths   in New York peaked on April 9.

• Covid-19 case trajectory in New York appears consistent with recent stock market price action.

• New York “Pause Order”, effectively keeping non-essential businesses closed, is scheduled to be lifted on May 15.

---

Credit Conditions Are Stressed Today

• One major macro risk in the current environment would be a disruption in credit markets, where a cascade of corporate defaults led to a weaker banking sector and reduced lending.

• Credit markets appear to be highly correlated with oil prices; where weak oil prices lead to greater credit market stress.

• Prolonged and excessively low oil prices may create systemic economic risk.

---

Trump’s Reelection Odds Rebounded w/ Stocks

• President Trump’s reelection odds (based on betting markets) seem to be tied with the stock market.

• Currently, the Predictit betting market is implying a roughly 50% chance of the President winning the November election; up from a recent low of 45% on March 19.

• This suggests that President Trump’s political fate rests heavily on the evolution of Covid-19 and the reopening of the economy.

---

Democrats’ Congressional Prospects Are Strong

• Despite President Trump’s recent rebound in betting markets, Democrats’ prospects for maintaining control of the House and retaking control of the Senate have improved.

• Currently, betting markets are suggesting that the most likely political scenario in January 2021 is a Trump White House and Democratically-controlled Congress.

---

Conclusion

The pandemic’s impact on the US economy has been severe and unprecedented. Since mid-March, nearly       1 out of 10 Americans have filed for unemployment, and economic growth may have contracted by 20-30%.

Last month, we stated: “…the economy and financial markets will either improve or devolve during the next few weeks and months based on the spread of Covid-19, the availability of therapeutic and preventative remedies, and the reopening of the economy. Quite simply, financial markets need the spread of the virus to slow, viral treatments to show clear and conclusive efficacy, and economies to reopen.”

We believe the behavior of the S&P 500 in March and April confirms that view; as the growth in Covid-19 and global economic shutdowns appeared to correlate with the steep decline in stock prices, while the peaking of the virus in many regions (Italy, Spain and New York) and news of re-openings appeared to correlate with a rebound in prices.

Based on the recent behavior of betting markets, President Trump’s prospects for reelection are tied with the stock market, and thus implicitly, the trajectory of Covid-19 and the economy. While the prospects for Democrats to retake the White House haven’t improved during the last month, the prospect of Democrats gaining control of both chambers of Congress has improved. At the moment, betting markets are suggesting a divided government is most likely in 2021, with a Trump White House and Democratic majorities in the House and Senate.

Paul Hoffmeister is chief economist and portfolio manager at Camelot Portfolios, managing partner of Camelot Event-Driven Advisors, and co-portfolio manager of  Camelot Event-Driven Fund  (tickers: EVDIX, EVDAX).

---

Disclosures

•Past performance may not be indicative of future results. Therefore, no current or prospective client should assume that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy (including the investments and/or investment strategies recommended by the adviser), will be profitable or equal to past performance levels.

•This material is intended to be educational in nature, and not as a recommendation of any particular strategy, approach, product or concept for any particular advisor or client.  These materials are not intended as any form of substitute for individualized investment advice.  The discussion is general in nature, and therefore not intended to recommend or endorse any asset class, security, or technical aspect of any security for the purpose of allowing a reader to use the approach on their own.  Before participating in any investment program or making any investment, clients as well as all other readers are encouraged to consult with their own professional advisers, including investment advisers and tax advisors.  Camelot Portfolios LLC can assist in determining a suitable investment approach for a given individual, which may or may not closely resemble the strategies outlined herein.

•Any charts, graphs, or visual aids presented herein are intended to demonstrate concepts more fully discussed in the text of this brochure, and which cannot be fully explained without the assistance of a professional from Camelot Portfolios LLC.  Readers should not in any way interpret these visual aids as a device with which to ascertain investment decisions or an investment approach.  Only your professional adviser should interpret this information.

•Some information in this presentation is gleaned from third party sources, and while believed to be reliable, is not independently verified.

An Arbitrageur’s View of Negative Oil Prices

Until this week, negative energy prices were known to only occur in Germany’s renewables-fueled electricity market. Anytime a breeze blows during the summer while the sun is shining, so much excess electricity is generated that German consumers are paid for burning electricity. The underlying cause is the lack of technology for electricity storage on a large scale.

Storage is easier to find for oil: when too much of it is produced, then the excess ends up in giant storage tanks. Sometimes, even oil tankers are chartered for storage. But, what’s unusual now is the fact that as a result of lower oil consumption due to the corona crisis, oil tanks are filling up almost everywhere. JP Morgan estimated at the beginning of April that all available storage capacities on land would be fully utilized by the end of May. In June, the last tanker on the high seas might be full to the brim.

Regional bottlenecks may occur even earlier, such as these days in the town of Cushing, Oklahoma. With a population of 7,800, it does not have the vibe of a global oil trading hub. But on the first day of every month, Cushing is the physical delivery location for crude oil futures traded on the New York commodities exchange known as NYMEX. Delivery options are somewhat limited: only tanks and pipelines managed by Enterprise or Enbridge qualify.

Most futures contracts are closed out before the delivery date and no physical oil ever changes hands. The futures price typically serves market participants as a reference price for other oil transactions that they index to it. And for anyone who actually accepts physical oil delivery in Cushing, they have to store it somewhere, and that storage capacity is currently in short supply. In fact, the limited facilities in Cushing or those that are easily accessible from Cushing are full. As a result, many oil traders were forced to sell their futures contracts for May 1st delivery before the last trading day on April 21st. Due to the storage problems, few buyers were able to step in. With an excess of sellers over buyers, the price not only went to zero, but collapsed into negative territory to a low of -$40.32.

Remarkably, the prices of futures for June 1st delivery or for the following months were not as significantly affected by this extraordinary set of circumstances. Crude oil for delivery on June 1 held above $20, and the subsequent delivery months were correspondingly higher in price.

Under normal market conditions, arbitrageurs ensure the integrity of futures prices. Hence, prices differ from one month to another mainly by storage costs of under one to two dollars per barrel per month. If prices diverge by more than that, arbitrageurs could buy oil futures with a delivery date of May 1st, sell at the same time futures for delivery on June 1st and store it temporarily for a month. If prices differ by more than the storage costs the arbitrageurs can make risk-free profits. For example, with negative futures prices of -$40 for the May 1st delivery and positive prices of $20 for June 1st delivery, an astronomical profit of $59 could be generated without much risk. But only in theory, because this strategy won't work without storage capacities. And if the arbitrage strategy cannot be implemented, then prices can diverge to non-economic levels.

Instead of arbitrageurs making profits in oil, bargain hunters ended up facing huge losses. Anyone who bought an oil future for $17 a barrel on Monday morning had to pay $38 in the evening to get rid of it. A loss of 324 percent in less than a day.

Some other circumstantial evidence suggests that the negative price was not real but merely a technical phenomenon. Brent oil futures did not face a similar move in the price of the front month. The important difference between Brent and WTI futures are that Brent futures are cash settled rather than settled through physical delivery of oil. Moreover, the oil underlying Brent is traded in Rotterdam, a maritime port that in addition to having pipeline access is also reached by oil tankers. In contrast, the oil in Cushing is landlocked so that transportation is limited by pipeline capacity.

In theory, oil futures contracts that allow for physical delivery should produce price discovery that is closer to the actual underlying; however, as we see all too often, theory and practice don’t always align. It is up to the NYMEX to modify the contract specifications in a way to minimize delivery problems in the future.

Physical delivery always gives rise to opportunities for mispricing, whether by accident as in the case of this week’s WTI oil price behavior, or by deliberate market manipulation. One of the authors used to trade bonds in Europe and often observed games being played with bonds deliverable into European government bond futures contracts. This is much less of a problem for the U.S. Treasury futures contract due to the much larger size of U.S. government debt compared to that of individual European countries. The parallels between delivery problems in bond futures and oil suggest that it is time for a complete overhaul of physically settled commodities futures – what happened in oil this week could perhaps happen pork bellies or other commodities in the future.

We will see during the next few days who shouldered the losses on the NYMEX WTI futures that went negative in price. The big ETFs and most professional oil investors usually roll their exposures weeks before the expiration of the futures contracts. They are well aware of the risks of waiting to the last minute. Therefore, the parties remaining on Monday were probably opportunistic investors that dabble in oil only occasionally and saw $20 as a great entry point for the long run, without realizing the roll problems that can be experienced in the physical settlement of futures contracts. Given the amount of leverage that can be employed with futures, some speculators are likely to have suffered devastating losses.

Thomas Kirchner, CFA has been responsible for the day-to-day management of the Camelot Event Driven Fund since its 2003 inception. Prior to joining Camelot he was previously was the founder of Pennsylvania Avenue Advisers LLC and the portfolio manager of the Pennsylvania Avenue Event-Driven Fund. He is the author of 'Merger Arbitrage; How To Profit From Global Event Driven Arbitrage.' (Wiley Finance, 2nd ed 2016).

Paul Hoffmeister is chief economist and portfolio manager at Camelot Portfolios, managing partner of Camelot Event-Driven Advisors, and co-portfolio manager of Camelot Event-Driven Fund (tickers: EVDIX, EVDAX).

---

B040 

 Disclosures:

•       Past performance may not be indicative of future results. Therefore, no current or prospective client should assume that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy (including the investments and/or investment strategies recommended by the adviser), will be profitable or equal to past performance levels.

•       This material is intended to be educational in nature, and not as a recommendation of any particular strategy, approach, product or concept for any particular advisor or client.  These materials are not intended as any form of substitute for individualized investment advice.  The discussion is general in nature, and therefore not intended to recommend or endorse any asset class, security, or technical aspect of any security for the purpose of allowing a reader to use the approach on their own.  Before participating in any investment program or making any investment, clients as well as all other readers are encouraged to consult with their own professional advisers, including investment advisers and tax advisors.  Camelot Event Driven Advisors can assist in determining a suitable investment approach for a given individual, which may or may not closely resemble the strategies outlined herein.

•       Any charts, graphs, or visual aids presented herein are intended to demonstrate concepts more fully discussed in the text of this brochure, and which cannot be fully explained without the assistance of a professional from Camelot Event Driven Advisors.  Readers should not in any way interpret these visual aids as a device with which to ascertain investment decisions or an investment approach.  Only your professional adviser should interpret this information.

Originally published on http://www.camelotportfolios.com/commentaries

A Race Against Time?

By Paul Hoffmeister

The 20% decline in the S&P 500 Index in the first quarter was the index’s worst first quarter performance in history, and its ninth worst calendar quarter performance ever. Most of the other major quarterly declines coincided with the Great Depression, the Black Monday crash of 1987, and the 2008-2009 Financial Crisis. Financially, the panic today is on par with some of the worst the country has ever seen. And on a personal level, too many Americans have died from this new virus, and the country is enduring a quarantine not experienced since 1918. We are, indeed, enduring a tragic moment in our country’s history.

While the S&P 500 was down -8.4% in February and then -12.5% in March, the sharp selloff in stock prices really began in late February when it became increasingly clear that the small clusters of Covid-19 infections outside of China had spread to the rest of the world. Quickly, the surreal images of ghost towns and overwhelmed hospitals in the city of Wuhan became a reality for almost everyone.

A forensic examination of the recent market selloff shows that the eruptions of Covid-19 infections in Italy, South Korea and Iran during the last week of February were arguably the catalyst for the recent panic selling in stocks, as the epidemic in Asia turned into a global pandemic. By late March, the White House’s leading medical advisors, Dr. Anthony Fauci and Dr. Deborah Birx, were warning publicly that between 100k and 2.2m Americans would die as a result of this new virus.[i] To put today’s tragedy into context, the total number of Americans killed in all U.S. wars has been approximately 1.1 million, according to PBS.[ii]

Of course, to slow the spread of the virus or “flatten the infection curve”, governments aroundthe world have issued travel restrictions and stay-at-home guidelines, which has come with great economic cost. As the Wall Street Journal’s Holman Jenkins put it, nearly 83% of the U.S. economy has been suppressed to relieve the pressure on the healthcare system.[iii]

How much has this virus and the global shutdown cost? Between December 31, 2019 and March 31, 2020, the market capitalization of the world’s equity markets fell $18.5 trillion to $68.5 trillion, according to the Bloomberg World Exchange Market Cap Index.

This massive and relatively sudden haircut in market wealth makes sense given the magnitude and velocity of the current economic slowdown and surge in unemployment. We are now bracing ourselves for a 20-30% contraction in US GDP, and just last week, an unprecedented 6.5 million Americans filed for unemployment. We expect these staggering job losses to continue while most of the US economy remains closed. Former Federal Reserve Chairman Janet Yellen believes that the true unemployment rate is already 12-13%.[iv]

The critical questions for investors are, what’s being done now to manage the pandemic and economic hardship, and will equity markets return to their previous highs anytime soon?

Aside from an aggressive effort to ensure the availability of healthcare equipment and therapies for the most stricken hot spots in the country, the federal policy response has been focused on providing temporary economic relief to individuals and corporations to weather the pandemic. The policy response has been politically down-the-middle, with a lot of temporary spending and credit measures.

The progressive left will be disappointed that no major, relatively permanent social safety net structures have been instituted (such as new broader, long-lasting federal healthcare programs), while the pro-growth right will be disappointed that no permanent improvements in economic incentives have been created (such as sharp tax rate reductions). This policy response is perhaps the only realistic outcome of a Republican-controlled White House and Democratically-controlled House.  

Notwithstanding, recent spending and credit programs have been massive. By the end of March, the White House and Congress approved the CARES Act, which will provide more than $2 trillion in economic relief -- the largest economic package ever passed by Congress. Included in the legislation are $1200 payments to most Americans, nearly $350 billion in partially forgivable loans to small businesses and non-profits, and $500 billion for the Treasury and Federal Reserve to provide liquidity and purchase corporate, municipal and state debt.[v] Reportedly, the Trump Administration is negotiating another $2 trillion dollar bill focused mainly on infrastructure spending.

In addition to these fiscal measures, the Federal Reserve among many other things slashed the federal funds rate from its 1.50%-1.75% target range to 0%-0.25% (we’re back to a zero interest rate policy or “ZIRP”), reduced the discount rate to 0.25% and attempted to destigmatize direct borrowing from the Fed, eased regulatory constraints to support lending to households and businesses, and established special facilities to steer credit directly to non-financial corporations.

In our view, the monetary policy response to the current economic crisis has been much faster and more aggressive than in 2008, and the Fed appears to be acting much more in the traditional fashion of a lender of last resort.

To be clear, the federal government’s fiscal and monetary measures today are arguably relief measures, as opposed to stimulus measures. They are policies to assist the broad economy in enduring the trillions of dollars in costs associated with Covid-19 shutdown. This will certainly help many individuals, and financial and non-financial institutions temporarily weather the crisis. But soon, if not already, the economy will need revenues restored.

This means that the economy and financial markets will either improve or devolve during the next few weeks and months based on the spread of Covid-19, the availability of therapeutic and preventative remedies, and the reopening of the economy. Quite simply, financial markets need the spread of the virus to slow, viral treatments to show clear and conclusive efficacy, and the economy to reopen.

Although there is a long way to go, there appears to be light at the end of the tunnel.

As of Tuesday April 7, China reported no new deaths, case numbers in European hotspots Italy and Spain were declining, and fatalities in New York appeared to be plateauing.[vi] As a result, we have seen lockdown restrictions lifted in Wuhan; Austria and Denmark plan to gradually lift restrictions next week; and while the U.S. still appears to be in the acceleration phase of infections, the White House is already crafting a plan to reopen the U.S. economy in the coming months.

As Larry Kudlow, director of the National Economic Council, said yesterday, “We are coming down, I think, the home stretch, that’s what the health experts are telling us.”[vii] Kudlow suggested that the economy will be begin to reopen within four to eight weeks.

A crucial step to reopening will be scaling up testing capabilities in order to better identify infected people and isolate them. Most likely, small towns that are far away from hotspots will be the first to reopen and implement extensive testing and viral surveillance programs. Undoubtedly, progress in therapeutic medicines and the widespread distribution of testing kits are critical today, for public health and the market outlook. Most parts of the economy will not be able to fully reopen without the necessary medical supplies and testing kits.

Defeating Covid-19 and reopening the economy couldn’t happen soon enough for markets. And perhaps the clearest case for that in financial markets is the credit market stress that currently exists. Credit spreads are “blowing out” faster than anything we’ve seen in recent history, and could be headed to 2008-2009 severity levels. There is a wave of corporate defaults on the horizon. The question is, will it be a size typical of periodic storms or a gigantic tsunami?

Given the nature of the federal policy response, which is mostly temporary and palliative, the economy may be in a race against time before either the previously believed once-in-a-multi-generation financial crisis of 2008-2009 happens again, or the federal government needs to step once more with additional capital to bear the burden of the massive economic cost of this pandemic.

How the next four to eight weeks play out is purely speculative. No one can forecast this kind of uncertainty. I am hopeful that human ingenuity will beat Covid-19. Sadly, it has cost the world dearly, in lives and treasure – so far nearly 90,000 deaths[viii] and tens of trillions of dollars. If the virus is not contained quickly and the economy does not reopen at least gradually, the federal government will need to step in again, quickly and aggressively. Unfortunately, we may only have a few weeks. Without question, we need the positive developments of the last week to continue. Evidence that the progress has temporarily stalled could mean the difference between a huge recovery rally and another bout of financial market panic.

---

Paul Hoffmeister is chief economist and portfolio manager at Camelot Portfolios, managing partner of Camelot Event-Driven Advisors, and co-portfolio manager of Camelot Event-Driven Fund  (tickers: EVDIX, EVDAX).

*******

Disclosures:

•       Past performance may not be indicative of future results. Therefore, no current or prospective client should assume that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy (including the investments and/or investment strategies recommended by the adviser), will be profitable or equal to past performance levels.

•       This material is intended to be educational in nature, and not as a recommendation of any particular strategy, approach, product or concept for any particular advisor or client.  These materials are not intended as any form of substitute for individualized investment advice.  The discussion is general in nature, and therefore not intended to recommend or endorse any asset class, security, or technical aspect of any security for the purpose of allowing a reader to use the approach on their own.  Before participating in any investment program or making any investment, clients as well as all other readers are encouraged to consult with their own professional advisers, including investment advisers and tax advisors.  Camelot Portfolios LLC can assist in determining a suitable investment approach for a given individual, which may or may not closely resemble the strategies outlined herein.

•       Any charts, graphs, or visual aids presented herein are intended to demonstrate concepts more fully discussed in the text of this brochure, and which cannot be fully explained without the assistance of a professional from Camelot Portfolios LLC.  Readers should not in any way interpret these visual aids as a device with which to ascertain investment decisions or an investment approach.  Only your professional adviser should interpret this information.

Some information in this presentation is gleaned from third party sources, and while believed to be reliable, is not independently verified.

---

[i] “Dr. Birx predicts up to 200,000 U.S. coronavirus deaths ‘if we do things almost perfectly,’ by Ben Kesslen, March 30, 2020, NBC News.

[ii] “How many Americans have dies in U.S. wars?” by Megan Crigger and Laura Stanthanam, May 27, 2019, PBS.

[iii] “Questioning the Clampdown,” by Holman Jenkins, March 17, 2020, Wall Street Journal.

[iv] “Janet Yellen says second quarter GDP could decline by 30% and unemployment is already at 12-13%,” by Jeff Cox, April 6, 2020, CNBC.

[v] Source: www.whitehouse.gov

[vi] “Asian shares rise, echoing Wall Street optimism on virus battle,” by Yuri Kageyama, April 7, 2020, SFGate.

[vii] “Trump Team Preps Plans to Reopen Economy That Depend on Testing,” by Mario Parker, April 7, 2020, Bloomberg.

[viii] Source: Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE) at Johns Hopkins University.

B011

Special Market Update

Camelot Portfolios

 Dear Friends,

The 20% decline we mentioned in our update last week swiftly became a 30% decline as the panic and economic damage over the Coronavirus continued to intensify.  We have now seen 3 days in a row with roughly 10% moves in the equity markets, leaving us at fresh closing lows today (Monday 3/16/2020).  The 12% selloff came despite significant Fed action over the weekend – including an emergency rate cut of 100 bps and a new $700 Billion Quantitative Easing program.

 I have heard in many conversations with advisors and clients the belief that this is going to get much worse before it gets better.  While this is absolutely true about the Coronavirus, it may or may not be true about the markets.  The stock market is a forward-looking discounting mechanism and is well-aware that the virus & economic fallout will get much worse.  This is why the market fell roughly 20% in just the last week.  In addition, we are seeing panic selling & forced selling (margin calls), which push the market further down.

The concerns expressed in our last couple updates regarding the credit markets are now elevated as cracks are appearing in several places.  A full-blown credit crisis could easily take the market down another 20%.  The Fed is now throwing trillions of dollars at this situation to keep it from spiraling out of control and whether or not they will be successful remains to be seen.  

Based on suggestions and orders from the President and many Governors over the last several days to self-isolate & shut down businesses, I believe we are now in recession, and it is likely as severe as what we experienced during 2008.  The official recession will not be declared until late this year, but by then we will likely be coming out of it.  The market already knows this and is trying to price it appropriately, but the extent of the damage is impossible to quantify at this point.  This economic damage is what the government needs to address, and quickly.  We expect to see several aid bills in the coming weeks as politicians want to keep their jobs. 

These factors all make it difficult to know where the bottom may be in the markets.  We may have already hit it, but if so, I do not expect a V-bottom like we saw coming out of 2018.  I expect we will chop along for a few weeks with sharp bounces and falls as the market tries to digest the impact of this crisis.  Frankly, I am suspicious of the sharp rallies we are seeing as the VIX and credit markets don’t seem to be supporting the moves.  Either way, if there is further downside ahead of us, I believe it will come fairly quickly and will bottom before the peak of the Coronavirus crisis. 

Bottom line – we are likely near the bottom (within 20%), so investments made at this point will probably produce nice returns 12 months out.  But the economic damage is immense with more to come.  I am concerned it is not yet fully priced into the market, much less over-priced as often happens.  So the best opportunities may still be ahead of us.  I believe the best approach is to start/continue buying on pullbacks in the market.  If we see an opportunity to go all in, we will let you know. 

Kind Regards,

Darren Munn

Chief Investment Officer